ERP consulting starts with process and data before the system name.
I help define the ERP logic the business needs, the integrations that matter, how to prepare for vendor selection, and how to manage implementation.
ERP consulting
I help clarify not only which system to choose, but how it should work inside your processes, data, and daily decisions.

I help define the ERP logic the business needs, the integrations that matter, how to prepare for vendor selection, and how to manage implementation.
Value
If requirements are unclear, processes are not refined, and the choice is made from a feature checklist, the project becomes more expensive and slower before implementation even starts.
Processes, priorities, requirements, and realistic scope.
Decision logic, integrations, testing, and vendor coordination.
Usage discipline, data quality, and next-stage development.
Related topics
What we clarify before an ERP decision
I help make the movement of an order, item, invoice, stock level, customer, or production step visible. This shows where ERP must support the business and where the process itself should be simplified first.
ERP value drops quickly when item, customer, supplier, price, or stock data has no clear rules. I focus on which data is required, who owns it, and how it moves between systems.
I help manage requirements, vendors, testing, migration, launch, and adoption. The goal is not only a system that is "installed", but a working process that people actually use.
Client outcome
After proper ERP preparation, leadership has a clearer basis for decisions: which system is needed, which integrations are essential, where the biggest risks are, and what must be fixed before launch. This reduces expensive mid-project changes and keeps vendor promises grounded in reality.
For foreign-owned Lithuanian operations
International teams often arrive with a group ERP template, but local operations still depend on RIVILE, warehouse tools, ecommerce, payroll, accounting workflows or country-specific document habits. I help translate these differences into vendor questions, fit-gap items and test scenarios.
ERP readiness
ERP, RIVILE, WMS, or CRM projects get stuck when system selection comes before the real operating model. I help clarify requirements, vendor comparison, integrations, and testing logic.
Accounting, sales, purchasing, warehouse, and management reporting work with different logic, so decisions rely on manual corrections.
When you are choosing ERP/RIVILE/WMS/CRM, planning an upgrade, stuck in implementation, or struggling to compare vendor offers.
If you only want to formally approve an already chosen tool without reviewing processes, data quality, and integrations.
Requirement structure, process map, vendor questions, fit-gap list, testing scenarios, and implementation risk control.
We prepare the ERP foundation before contract or before the next implementation wave: processes, requirements, data, integrations, ownership, and testing plan.
Vendors answer the same real questions, making the decision more objective.
Clear requirements reduce expensive interpretations during implementation.
The system is evaluated by daily work, not by module names.
We quickly collect facts, pains, systems, and decision points.
We separate quick wins from larger projects and risks.
We connect process, data, vendors, team, and testing.
We make sure the solution is used, not only launched.
In 45 minutes we review processes, requirements, vendor questions, and the risks that usually become expensive during ERP/RIVILE implementation.
Request an ERP/RIVILE diagnosticFAQ
An ERP project is a business process project. The system matters, but it matters even more to know what it must change in daily operations.
In most cases, describe processes, data, integrations, and ownership first. Then you choose an ERP vendor based on real needs, not a generic feature list.
Readiness means clear goals, key processes, data owners, integration needs, test scenarios, and decision makers. Without this, the project usually becomes slower and more expensive.
Yes, and often this is the best path. The important part is deciding what is the necessary foundation, what can come later, and what should not be part of the first wave at all. Phasing reduces risk.
Common reasons include unclear requirements, poor data, too little user involvement, many unresolved decisions, and weak vendor coordination. My role is to manage these risks earlier.
An ERP consultant in Lithuania helps clarify local operating needs, ERP/RIVILE/WMS/CRM relationships, process requirements, vendor questions, integrations, testing and implementation risks before the project becomes expensive to change.
Proof from practice
SharePoint and Microsoft 365 document governance before safer AI use and more reliable answers.
Coordinating CRM, ERP, BSS and SharePoint integrations across teams and operating models.
Inventory, ordering and warehouse process improvements measured by operating outcomes, not slide decks.